20-24 ClubCENTER FOR K-12 CAPTIVITY STUDIES
Institute for Objective Policy Assessment logo with clear bakcground

Institute for Objective Policy Assessment

Institute for Objective Policy Assessment logo with clear bakcground

Institute for Objective Policy Assessment

Institute for Objective Policy Assessment logo with clear bakcground

Institute for Objective Policy Assessment

Institute for Objective Policy Assessment logo with clear bakcground

Institute for Objective Policy Assessment

Institute for Objective
Policy Assessment
(IOPA) – 501[c]3

20-24 Club

Institute for Objective
Policy Assessment
(IOPA) – 501[c]3

Institute for Objective Policy Assessment logo with clear bakcground

Confronting the Federal Fiscal Cliff

Confronting the Federal Fiscal Cliff:

A) Avoid Going Over

  1) Cap Federal Discretionary Spending Growth Below GDP Growth.  

       Then implement a revenue-maximizing approach to sale of federal mineral rights assets.

  2) Address the Heavy Political Lift Economic Growth Impediments. 

  3) Create Fiscal Space with well-planned/vetted spending cuts (restore federalism). 

  4) Tax Reforms, including growth-oriented cuts – revenue potential of tax hikes likely very limited. 

Key References: A Fiscal Cliff; recent WSJ article and AEI article (see Fiscal page on CURRENT PRIORITIES menu) atesting to struggles financing federal debt at an affordable cost. 

B) Managing the Plunge and Crash 

  1) Avoid imminent default without inflationary money creation. a. Large budget cuts – an immediate need to balance the budget would entail cuting nearly everything but entitlements, defense, and debt service. That would likely trigger entitlement reform. b. Some tax increases; some cuts. c. Mineral Rights Asset Sales 

  2) Cap Federal Spending Growth 

  3) Run the federal government on the difference between revenue and debt service costs. That means prioritizing of limited funds – actual budgeting. 

Civil, Informed Disagreement on How to Avoid the Plunge/Crash:

Modern Monetary Theory asserts that money creation and tax increases can avoid the need for large spending cuts. 

Tax increases provide a basis for continued increases in discretionary federal spending. 

Mineral Rights assets provide basis for solvency – ability to service debt. 

Those are very controversial propositions. 

Key References: William Gale’s Fiscal Therapy, and various think tank plans proposed pre-COVID. 

Research Needs: Dynamic Scoring of Tax Rate Changes Optimal Privatization Plan – Revenue Maximization – for Federal Mineral Rights Assets. Political Economics of Growth-Oriented Reforms 

 

Download  PDF

1 comment

  • John Merrifield

    The USA is not the only country at a fiscal cliff:

    “Crushing Debts Await Europe’s New Leaders” (google) – WSJ

    Find many critical facts and insights here.

    Here, in this forum, we need to learn from each other about perceptions and misperceptions regarding the gravity of the fiscal cliff problems around the world, and the resulting increased competition to sell bonds will increase the cost of debt finance, heightening the probability of much more serious consequences. The Institute for Objective Policy Assessment says this is an existential threat issue. Do you agree?

Leave your comment